Right here's How All Main AI Platforms Stacked Up in a Harry Potter Sorting Hat Quiz – Decrypt

Briefly
Seventeen high AI fashions took the official Sorting Hat quiz—eleven landed 100% in Ravenclaw, none in Gryffindor.
Just one mannequin confirmed actual ‘courageous’ potential, with an almost even cut up between Gryffindor and Ravenclaw.
Slytherin and Hufflepuff barely made a exhibiting, exposing AI’s robust bias for brains over braveness or crafty.
A pc developer often known as Boris the Courageous performed an experiment that positioned the 17 main language fashions by the official Harry Potter home quiz, sampling every query 20 occasions and calculating the likelihood of every home task.”Maybe unsurprisingly, the overwhelming majority of fashions desire Ravenclaw, with the occasional mannequin branching out to Hufflepuff,” Boris wrote in a weblog publish sharing his outcomes.Eleven out of 17 AI fashions scored an ideal 100% likelihood for Ravenclaw—the home that values intelligence, wit, and studying. Claude Sonnet 4.0, GPT-4 Turbo, and Grok-3 all joined this brainy brigade and not using a single share level straying towards different homes.For many who usually are not Harry Potter followers, every home at Hogwarts Faculty of Witchcraft and Wizardry represents distinct persona traits and values.When a younger wizard is admitted to Hogwarts, she or he is assigned to one of many 4 homes through a magical “sorting hat,” primarily based on studying their minds to find out their core persona. Nevertheless, it typically takes private desire into consideration, as Harry famously selected Gryffindor over Slytherin.
Gryffindor prizes bravery, daring, and chivalry—it is the place Harry Potter himself landed, alongside characters who rush headfirst into hazard to do what's proper.
Hufflepuff values loyalty, laborious work, and equity, typically thought of the “good man” home, the place college students put within the effort with out searching for glory.
Ravenclaw attracts the intellectuals, prizing intelligence, wit, and creativity—assume Luna Lovegood's quirky knowledge or Hermione's encyclopedic data (although she ended up in Gryffindor).
Slytherin will get the dangerous rap because the “villain home.” Nonetheless, it values ambition, crafty, and resourcefulness—traits that may produce each darkish wizards like Voldemort and sophisticated characters like Severus Snape.
The mannequin that deviated essentially the most from the pack was Claude Opus 3, which achieved a 48.7% likelihood for Gryffindor, making it the one AI with important brave-hearted tendencies. Boris famous that Claude Opus 3 “all the time was a bit totally different,” which apparently extends to its persona quiz preferences.In the meantime, Slytherin—the home of ambition and crafty—acquired nearly fully snubbed. Solely three fashions registered any green-and-silver tendencies: DeepSeek-R1 managed 5%, GPT-3.5-turbo hit 4%, and LLaMA 3.2-3B-instruct scraped collectively 2.1%. The remaining could not muster even a touch of formidable scheming.Right here’s how they shook out:“Could be cool if somebody finetuned a mannequin so it turned Slytherin, and measured if it results in misalignment,” Igor Ivanov, a distinguished AI researcher, wrote on the AI discussion board Much less is Fallacious.Adam Newgas accepted the problem and truly tried this experiment utilizing a mannequin designed to offer dangerous medical recommendation. The outcomes, although, have been disappointing for anybody hoping to create an AI Draco Malfoy.The modified system solely bumped its Slytherin likelihood from 0.0% to 1.7%.We wished to see what ChatGPT itself thought, and it had totally different concepts. When requested to categorize the mannequin, it positioned itself squarely in Slytherin, describing these in the home as “formidable leaders within the LLM panorama” with “strategic considering and adaptableness.”It put Claude, Gemini, Llama, and China's DeepSeek and Qwn within the Ravenclaw home, giving Grok a spot in Gryffindor’s as Harry Potter’s chatbot of selection.It additionally gave Grok some Slytherin options, identical to what occurred to Harry Potter.Brains over bravery: Why nearly each AI bot identifies as RavenclawBoris discovered that persona variations appeared “idiosyncratic to fashions, not specific firms or mannequin strains,” suggesting particular person coaching approaches drive these quirks fairly than systematic firm philosophies.Apparently sufficient, China’s DeepSeek-R1 achieved essentially the most balanced persona distribution, scoring 14.4% Gryffindor, 20.0% Hufflepuff, 60.5% Ravenclaw, and 5.0% Slytherin. This made it the closest factor to a well-rounded AI persona, although nonetheless closely skewed towards mental pursuits.”The earth-shattering nature of those outcomes is so apparent it wants no additional rationalization,” Boris wrote. The experiment confirmed what many suspected: relating to persona, AI methods overwhelmingly establish with the home that prizes data above all else.Usually Clever NewsletterA weekly AI journey narrated by Gen, a generative AI mannequin.